Makers of HandPunch Timeclocks Illegally Capture Illinois Employees’ Biometric Data, Class Action Claims
Last Updated on June 18, 2024
Gutierrez v. Recognition Systems, Inc. et al.
Filed: June 3, 2024 ◆§ 9:24-cv-03999
A class action claims the companies behind HandPunch timeclocks have captured employees’ hand geometry scans without complying with Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act.
New York
A proposed class action claims the companies behind HandPunch timeclocks have captured and stored employees’ hand geometry scans without complying with Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 15-page lawsuit says defendants Recognition Systems, Inc. and parent company Ingersoll Rand, Inc. are prohibited under the BIPA from collecting, purchasing or otherwise obtaining Illinois residents’ biometric identifiers—i.e., personal features unique to an individual—without first providing written notification and securing their consent.
The plaintiff, an Illinois resident whose employer required him to scan his hand geometry on a HandPunch device to clock in and out of work, claims the defendants never obtained his permission to collect and store his biometric information. According to the filing, the companies have illegally captured the hand geometry scans of hundreds, if not thousands, of Illinois workers through their biometric-enabled timeclocks.
The suit explains that after the HandPunch devices measure an employee’s distinct hand size and shape, this data is transmitted to and stored in the defendants’ cloud-based time and attendance systems.
“Unlike key fobs, identification numbers, or swipe cards—which can be changed or replaced if stolen or compromised—fingerprints and/or hand geometry biometrics are unique, permanent biometric identifiers associated with each employee,” the complaint says. “This exposes employees who are required to use [the defendants’] devices as a condition of their employment to serious and irreversible privacy risks.”
Per the filing, the BIPA also requires companies to inform residents in writing of the specific purpose and length of time for which their biometrics are being collected, stored and used. By law, private entities must also publish a publicly available policy governing how and when residents’ biometric information will be permanently deleted, the case relays.
The makers of the HandPunch devices have failed to fulfill these BIPA obligations, the suit alleges.
The lawsuit looks to represent any Illinois residents who, since June 3, 2019, have had their hand geometry scans captured, collected or otherwise obtained in the state by Recognition Systems and/or Ingersoll Rand.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.