in Newswire Published on December 14, 2020

Performance-Enhancing? Class Action Says Under Armour’s ‘Rush’ Apparel Provides No Endurance, Recovery Benefits

Dill v. Under Armour, Inc.

Filed: December 14, 2020 § 1:20-cv-06066

A class action claims Under Armour has falsely advertised its "Rush" line of athletic apparel as able to provide infrared radiation-aided endurance- and recovery-boosting benefits.

Case Spotlight

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?

ClassAction.org Newsletter

Stay Current

Sign Up For
Our Newsletter

New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.

This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it: Download PDF.

Last Updated on December 14, 2020 — 4:52 PM

Corrado Rizzi

corrado@classaction.org

Corrado Rizzi is the Senior Managing Editor of ClassAction.org.

About ClassAction.org

ClassAction.org is a group of online professionals (designers, developers and writers) with years of experience in the legal industry.

Learn More

Before commenting, please review our comment policy.