Issue 371: Take Action Over Ticketmaster Fees
December 17, 2025 — Issue #371We find ourselves mentioning Ticketmaster again in this issue, as attorneys investigate how the company administers its hefty fees.
We find ourselves mentioning Ticketmaster again in this issue, as attorneys investigate how the company administers its hefty fees.
In this issue, attorneys are still looking into several “social casinos” under the suspicion that they could be set up for illegal online gambling, with a new platform added to their investigation.
In this issue, we’ll touch on how attorneys may be able to start a new class action lawsuit against Uponor over its PEX piping.
Online privacy is still a concern in this issue, as attorneys investigate whether a popular pharmacy chain is secretly collecting and sharing medical information, along with a fintech data breach that occurred earlier this year.
We’re opening this issue with a massive baby formula recall and how those who bought the products may be able to take action.
If you or a family member developed lung cancer from asbestos, you may be able to take legal action.
If you applied for a job recently and the company used AI as a part of the screening or interview process, you’ll want to check out our first story.
In this issue, we have information about Dupixent, an injectable drug used to treat eczema, asthma, and more, and how it may be linked to a very specific form of T-cell lymphoma.
In this week’s issue, we’re taking a look at the potential pitfalls of a certain multi-level marketing company and how attorneys may be able to help sales reps take action over what could amount to deceptive business practices.
We’re opening this issue with a new investigation involving claims that a popular kids’ video game has become a mainstream contributor to sexual exploitation.
We’re opening this week’s issue with a look at legal action attorneys are pursuing over a data breach that may have impacted hundreds of millions of hotel guests.
We’re opening this week’s edition with the ongoing issue of when workers should be considered independent contractors as opposed to employees, with a new investigation looking into Lyft specifically.