Wayfair Class Action Lawsuit Claims Retailer’s Return Policy Deceives Consumers
Stansfield v. Wayfair, Inc.
Filed: March 23, 2026 ◆§ 26STCV09347
A class action lawsuit says that Wayfair fails to clearly disclose that many items are not eligible to be returned within the advertised 30-day window.
California Unfair Competition Law California Consumers Legal Remedies Act California False Advertising Law
California
Wayfair faces a proposed class action lawsuit that alleges the home goods retailer fails to adequately disclose that much of its merchandise is non-returnable, despite prominently advertising a 30-day return policy throughout its website.
Get class action lawsuit and class action settlement news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter.
The 13-page false advertising lawsuit contends that Wayfair has misled consumers into believing that the majority of its products are returnable pursuant to the 30-day return window advertised on the Wayfair home page, product pages, shopping cart pages and checkout pages. In reality, the class action lawsuit says, a “substantial volume” of Wayfair’s merchandise is designated as non-returnable, something many shoppers do not learn until they’ve reached the final checkout page.
The complaint relays that Wayfair’s 30-day policy is promoted “prominently and pervasively” throughout the company’s website. On certain product pages, however, a small notice indicates that this policy is not available for all merchandise, without specifying which items are not covered, the filing says.
The case charges Wayfair has deceived consumers by failing to disclose which items are not covered, obstructing the non-returnable notices on certain product pages, and failing to prominently post non-returnable notices on the checkout page.
“First, the product page itself advertises a 30-day return policy without disclosing that the specific item being viewed is non-returnable, leading the consumer to begin the purchase process under a false impression,” the filing argues.
Moreover, when consumers are shown a notice on their shopping cart page, the notice is displayed by a small “i” information icon in light text that is “easily overlooked” in comparison to the prominent, bolded text advertising “30-day returns” on the same page, the lawsuit says.
The filing emphasizes the “complete absence” of any notices about non-returnable items once a consumer proceeds past their cart and initiates a purchase on the checkout page.
“Critically, by the time the consumer reaches the checkout page—the page where the consumer finalizes and commits to the purchase—the non-returnable notice has disappeared entirely,” the complaint states. “The checkout page continues to prominently display the ‘30-Day Returns’ banner, but contains no indication whatsoever that the item the consumer is about to purchase cannot be returned.”
The filing contends that the option to return an item is a factor that can significantly influence a consumer’s purchasing decision, and that Wayfair fraudulently strips consumers of this knowledge by failing to conspicuously disclose which items can and cannot be returned within the 30-day window.
Among those misled by Wayfair’s alleged deception is the plaintiff, a California resident, who claims to have not been made aware that his $98.98 purchase in early 2026 was for a non-returnable item.
According to the class action lawsuit, the plaintiff’s shopping and checkout experiences similarly included limited, nonspecific mention of what items were non-returnable and, sitewide, he was presented with the “30-day return policy on most items,” including on the checkout page.
The Wayfair return policy class action lawsuit looks to provide public injunctive relief under the California Unfair Competition Law, California False Advertising Law, and California Consumers Legal Remedies Act to protect Californians from Wayfair’s allegedly deceptive advertising.
Check out ClassAction.org’s free legal resources to learn how to file a class action lawsuit.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.