Popular Bank Hit with Class Action Over Allegedly Improper Overdraft Fee Practices [UPDATE]
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on August 14, 2024
Lipsett v. Banco Popular North America
Filed: May 13, 2022 ◆§ 1:22-cv-03901
Popular Community Bank faces claims that it has charged customers improper overdraft fees on transactions that did not actually overdraw their accounts.
August 14, 2024 – Judge Preliminarily Approves $1.5M Popular Bank Overdraft Fee Settlement
The Popular Bank lawsuit detailed on this page has been settled for $1.5 million.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The class action settlement, which was preliminarily approved by the court on July 26, 2024, covers any Popular Bank consumer checking accountholder who, at any time between May 13, 2016 and July 25, 2024, was assessed and not refunded an overdraft (OD) fee in connection with a debit card or other ATM transaction on their account that was the subject of an authorization made on or before April 15, 2020, and/or a debit card or other ATM transaction that was authorized against positive funds on or after April 16, 2020.
Excluded from these categories of OD fees are those that were assessed on or before August 6, 2018 against class members covered in the settlement of a separate case, Valle v. Popular Community Bank, the settlement agreement notes.
The plaintiff first notified the court of the Popular Bank settlement on July 25, 2024 in a motion and attendant memo outlining the terms of the deal. The parties now await final approval of the settlement terms from United States District Judge Margaret M. Garnett.
Popular Bank will pay $1,500,000 to be distributed among eligible class members on a pro rata basis, the settlement agreement shares. Per the agreement, individual payment amounts will be calculated by dividing the settlement fund by the total amount of covered OD fees that class members were collectively assessed, then multiplying it by the total dollar amount of fees a class member was individually charged and paid in connection with the transactions at issue.
According to the agreement, class members do not have to do anything to receive settlement benefits. If the deal receives final approval from the court following a hearing slated for January 7, 2025, current accountholders will automatically receive an account credit, and former accountholders will receive payment by check.
The plaintiff’s memo adds that Popular Bank has also agreed not to assess overdraft fees on debit card transactions that are authorized against available funds for a period of five years.
ClassAction.org will update this page when an official Popular Bank settlement website is launched.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Banco Popular North America, who does business as Popular Community Bank, has been hit with a proposed class action that alleges it has charged customers improper overdraft fees on transactions that did not actually overdraw their accounts.
The 17-page lawsuit claims that although Popular Bank’s checking account documents state in “plain, clear, and simple language” that overdraft (OD) fees will be charged only when an account has insufficient funds to cover a transaction, the bank has taken to charging such fees on transactions that were initially authorized but settled into a negative balance days later.
According to the suit, there should always be sufficient funds in an account to cover such transactions, which are described in the complaint as “Authorize Positive, Purportedly Settle Negative” (APPSN) transactions, given that the money is initially set aside by Popular Bank and unavailable for other uses. Thus, an APPSN transaction should never be subject to overdraft fees, the lawsuit argues.
“In short, Banco Popular is not authorized by contract to charge OD Fees on transactions that have not overdrawn an account, but it has done so and continues to do so,” the complaint contends.
The lawsuit explains that when a customer makes a purchase with their debit card, Popular Bank deducts from their available balance the amount needed to cover the transaction, and thus earmarks those funds to pay the merchant later. However, if an intervening transaction causes a customer’s account balance to go negative before the initial transaction settles, it is Popular Bank’s apparent practice to charge an overdraft fee on both the intervening and initially authorized transactions, according to the suit.
The problem, the case says, is that Popular Bank’s practice of charging overdraft fees on APPSN transactions is not disclosed in the bank’s account documents, which plainly state that customers will be charged an overdraft fee only when their account does not contain sufficient funds to cover a transaction. Because Popular Bank sequesters the funds for APPSN transactions when they’re first authorized, there should always be sufficient funds in a customer’s account to cover the transactions when they settle days later, the case states.
The lawsuit says Popular Bank’s overdraft fee practice with regard to APPSN transactions stems from “a secret batching posting process” during which the bank, “in the middle of the night,” temporarily releases the holds placed on funds in an account and then re-debits the transactions a second time.
“This secret step allows Banco Popular to charge OD Fees on transactions that never should have caused an overdraft—transactions that were authorized into sufficient funds, and for which Banco Popular specifically set aside money to pay them,” the complaint contends. “This discrepancy between Banco Popular’s actual practices and the contract causes accountholders to incur more OD Fees than they should.”
The case argues that there is “no justification for these practices,” except to maximize the bank’s revenue.
The lawsuit looks to cover all Banco Popular accountholders in the U.S. who, during the applicable statute of limitations period, were charged an overdraft fee on an APPSN transaction on a Banco Popular checking account.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.