Lime-Flavored Perrier Sparkling Water Contains Less Lime Than Advertised, Class Action Alleges [UPDATE]
Last Updated on February 20, 2024
Mccoy v. Nestlé USA, Inc.
Filed: January 29, 2023 ◆§ 3:23-cv-02218
A class action alleges lime-flavored Perrier sparkling water is misleadingly labeled in that the beverage, contrary to what consumers expect, contains only a “trace” amount of lime.
Florida
February 20, 2024 – Perrier Lime Sparkling Water Lawsuit Dismissed
The proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page was dismissed with prejudice on February 1, 2024.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
In a 13-page order granting Nestlé’s motion to dismiss the case, U.S. District Judge M. Casey Rodgers found that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege that the Perrier product’s packaging was misleading to a reasonable consumer.
Specifically, Judge Casey pointed out that the product label makes no claims about the source of the sparking water’s lime flavor.
“[T]he label’s use of the word ‘lime’ and depiction of lime wedges represents only that the Product is lime flavored,” the judge wrote. “The label does not state ‘made with lime’ or use other language conveying that the Product includes lime or lime juice.”
Judge Casey also noted that the beverage’s back label explicitly says it “contains no juice,” and that reasonable consumers would not be misled into believing the product is made with an appreciable amount of lime based on its green-tinted container since it’s “evident that the bottle, not the water, is colored.”
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
A proposed class action alleges lime-flavored Perrier sparkling mineral water is misleadingly labeled in that the beverage, contrary to what consumers expect, contains only a “trace” amount of lime.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 17-page lawsuit argues that, upon viewing the word “lime” and pictures of lime wedges on the beverage’s front label, consumers are led to expect that the Perrier sparkling water is flavored with real lime ingredients. The complaint also contends that consumers will conclude that the sparkling water contains lime because the product’s green-tinted bottle makes its contents appear greener.
In truth, the beverage, contrary to consumer expectations, contains flavors that merely imitate the taste of limes, the case claims.
Per the case, “lime juice” would be listed as a separate ingredient if the beverage actually contained all of the nutritive and taste attributes of lime, but the product’s ingredients list mentions only mineral water, carbon dioxide and natural flavors. The “natural flavors” ingredient indicates that the product contains flavor compounds that are synthesized in a lab and only imitate the fruit’s taste, the complaint alleges.
“The cost of using more lime would be several cents per bottle based on spot markets for lime,” the suit states.
According to the complaint, defendant Nestlé USA has been able to sell more lime-flavored Perrier sparkling water at higher prices than it would have absent its “false and misleading” representations. Nestlé has taken advantage of the fact that consumers prefer beverages that are less processed and are made without additives or solvents, the filing says.
The suit further contends that consumers have no reason to expect that the product, sold under the “esteemed” Perrier brand and imported from France, is made with only a “de minimis” amount of lime.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone in Florida, Utah, South Dakota, Kansas, Mississippi, Arkansas, Alaska, Wyoming or South Carolina who purchased the Perrier lime-flavored sparkling mineral water during the applicable statute of limitations period.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.