Class Action Alleges Dunkin’ Violates State Gift Card Laws by Refusing to Refund Small Balances [DISMISSED]
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on September 8, 2023
Crooks v. Dunkin’ Brands Group Inc. et al.
Filed: May 12, 2022 ◆§ 1:22-cv-10738
A proposed class action claims Dunkin’ Brands misrepresents the value of its gift cards by failing to disclose that the cards are completely nonrefundable.
Massachusetts
September 8, 2023 – Parties Request Dismissal of Dunkin’ Gift Card Refund Class Action
The parties handling the proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page jointly filed a request for the suit’s dismissal on June 23, 2023.
Last August, the defendants moved to dismiss an amended complaint filed in July 2022, arguing in a 28-page memo that the plaintiffs had failed to state a claim. The motion was partially granted in December 2022 by United States District Judge Patti B. Saris, who threw out the claim brought under the New Jersey Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act but upheld the other counts in the amended complaint.
Court records show that following a hearing on November 8, 2022, the parties filed a joint statement affirming that, along with setting budgets and establishing case deadlines, they had discussed the possibility of resolving the litigation “through the use of alternative dispute resolution programs.”
The parties jointly requested dismissal of the suit seven months later, in June 2023.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
A proposed class action claims Dunkin’ Brands misrepresents the value of its gift cards by failing to disclose that gift card holders will be unable to redeem any remaining funds on their cards when the balance falls below a certain amount.
According to the 11-page case, Dunkin’ and subsidiary SVC Service II, LLC offer reloadable gift cards intended for use at their coffee and snack shops and represent that the cards’ value “may not be redeemed for cash, check or credit unless required by law.”
The suit alleges, however, that this representation is misleading because Dunkin’ fails to disclose that its gift cards are completely non-refundable, “even in situations where state law requires it.”
Per the case, although at least 10 states, including Massachusetts and New Jersey, require retailers to provide a cash refund up to a certain amount for a gift card’s remaining value, Dunkin’ refuses to do so.
“These small balances add up,” the complaint contends. “Defendants have distributed millions of these cards to Gift Card purchasers and holders throughout the United States. Thus, Defendants have acquired at least millions of dollars in revenue to which they are not entitled.”
The lawsuit alleges that at the point of sale, consumers who purchase Dunkin’s gift cards remain unaware that they come with “unfair, deceptive, and illegal conditions.” Per the suit, Dunkin’ fails to disclose that its policy is to never allow customers to redeem a card’s remaining balance, even in states that require retailers to do so.
One such state is Massachusetts, the suit says, where the purchaser or holder of a gift certificate is permitted to request the remaining balance in cash if it is $5.00 or less. Per the case, New Jersey and at least eight other states have statutes that require retailers to provide cash refunds of up to a certain amount for a gift card’s remaining balance.
The plaintiff, a Manchester, New Jersey resident, says he possesses a Dunkin’ gift card with a remaining balance of $4.54 but has been unable to redeem it due to the defendants’ policies and practices.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone in the U.S. who possesses a gift card maintained by Dunkin’ Brands and SVC Service II, LLC.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.