According to a proposed class action lawsuit out of New York, “8-Hour Moisture,” “SPF 15” Chapstick is misleadingly advertised by defendant Wyeth Consumer Healthcare in that the product does not truthfully provide all-day or extended protection against sun damage.
As the 16-page complaint tells it, the defendant’s misrepresentations of the efficacy of “8-Hour Moisture” Chapstick and its apparent SPF 15 protection increases the risk of harm to consumers because the company’s claims about the product encourage less-frequent application while exposed to the sun. Despite Wyeth’s claims, the case points out that the Drug Facts section on the back of the product’s packaging instructs users to reapply the Chapstick at least every two hours:
Reasonable consumers, the lawsuit says, are accustomed to sunscreen products being effective for a finite number of hours. It is plausible, according to the suit, that consumers will link Chapstick’s 8-hour moisture and SPF 15 claims “to frequency of application to maintain the benefits of sun protection.”
“There is no other plausible reason why a specific, finite duration for the moisture-producing abilities of the Products is used in this way,” the case reads, “especially because consumers value and will pay more for sun protection products which provide longer protection from the sun."
The suit goes on to argue that while products comparable to 8-hour moisture Chapstick are also advertised as providing an intensive level of moisture with SPF 15 protection, none are represented in as “definitive and precise” a way as Wyeth touts Chapstick.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.