Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit: Breathing Devices Linked to Cancer, Lung Damage

If you own one of the CPAP, BiPAP or mechanical ventilator devices subject to Philips’ June 2021 recall, attorneys working with ClassAction.org would like to speak with you.

They have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Philips knew well before the recall about the health risks associated with the machines and is not likely to replace the lifesaving, necessary devices anytime soon. To help strengthen their case, the attorneys need to hear from additional users of the recalled machines.

To learn more about your rights and how you could get involved in the litigation against Philips, fill out the form on this page. After you get in touch, one of the attorneys working with ClassAction.org may reach out to you directly via phone or email. It doesn’t cost anything to get in touch or to speak to someone about your rights.

Philips Recall: What Happened?

On June 14, 2021, Philips announced that it would be recalling three to four million continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and mechanical ventilator devices over risks associated with the products’ sound abatement foam. According to the recall notice, the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam may break down into particles and enter the devices’ air pathways where they could be inhaled or ingested by the user.

Lab analysis of the degraded foam has reportedly revealed the presence of several potentially harmful chemicals, including toluene diisocyanate and toluene diamine. The suit points out that the European Union considers toluene diisocyanate “highly toxic” and has concluded that toluene diamine is not safe for use, even as a hair dye.  

According to the recall, devices used in areas of high heat or high humidity may be more prone to foam degradation.

Philips also admitted that the foam material can “off-gas” certain chemicals that can lead to irritation and airway inflammation, which can be particularly concerning for patients with underlying lung disease and reduced cardiopulmonary reserve. According to the company, the potential risks associated with exposure to these chemicals include lung irritation, headaches, dizziness and even cancer.

In issuing the recall, Philips asked that CPAP and BiPAP patients discontinue their use of the machines and speak with their doctors about “the most appropriate options for continued treatment.” The company stressed that patients using life-sustaining mechanical ventilator devices should not alter or stop therapy before speaking to their physicians.

Which Devices Are Affected?

The following devices were part of Philips’ June 2021 recall.

The majority of the affected devices are in the first-generation DreamStation product family, according to Philips.

What Does the Lawsuit Say?  

The lawsuit accuses Philips of knowing well before the June recall of the health risks associated with the foam used to minimize noise in its sleep and respiratory devices.

In fact, the suit claims that users have complained about “black particles” in their devices “for several years before the recall.” Philips’ first announcement to the public, however, came only in April 2021 when the company disclosed in a quarterly reportthat testing and user reports led to the discovery that the foam posed certain risks.

The suit also alleges that patients would never have paid as much as they did for their sleep and breathing devices had they known the foam could lead to serious health problems.

Further, while the recall alerts patients and doctors to the foam issue, it does not offer a readily available fix for the millions of Americans who use the devices on a daily basis. According to the suit, Philips “has no concrete timeline for replacing any devices,” meaning that many patients will likely need to replace their devices at full price while they wait for a true resolution from Philips. 

What Side Effects Are Associated with the Recalled Devices?

How Could a Class Action Lawsuit Help?

A class action lawsuit could provide consumers with money back for the devices they had to purchase at their own expense following the recall. While Philips promises to replace the sound abatement foam, the lawsuit alleges the company “is not currently replacing the foam in the affected devices and may take a year or more to provide replacements.” Further, the design of the foam allegedly makes it difficult for consumers to replace on their own.

Many may be forced to buy Philips’ next-generation machine or one from a competitor to continue their therapy; however, there is a shortage of CPAP machines, which may make it difficult for some patients to obtain replacements. A class action lawsuit could help cover these costs, as well as force Philips to create a medical monitoring program for patients who used the devices and are concerned about future health risks.   

What You Can Do

Before commenting, please review our comment policy.