• Lawsuit List

    Most Popular

    • Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits
    • Cochlear Implant Lawsuits
    • Tepezza Hearing Loss Lawsuits
    • Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
    • Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits
    • PGT-A IVF Testing Lawsuits
    • Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit
    • Port-a-Cath Lawsuits
    • View All Lawsuits →
  • Settlements
  • Data Breaches
  • Legal News
    • Newswire
    • Blog
  • Learn
  • About Us
 
 

ClassAction.org

Lawsuit News & Updates

 
 

October 15, 2020

Issue #112

Potential Vehicle Defect May Affect Millions

In our latest issue, we’ll take a look at a lawsuit claiming that a startling number of vehicles may be suffering from an electrical defect that prevents the airbags and seatbelts from working properly in the event of a front-end crash. From there, we’ll center in on allegations that some companies aren’t being completely honest about their products when it comes to both quantity and quality. From mosquito repellant to beauty supplies, the latest stories can be found below.

- Ty Armstrong, Writer/Community Manager

Lawsuit Claims Defect May Prevent Airbags, Seatbelts from Working Properly

We rely on the safety features of our vehicles on a daily basis, so any discrepancy between what we’ve been told is safe and how things actually shake out in real life can be quite alarming. Take this, for example: a new class action lawsuit is claiming that a group of automakers and parts manufacturers have intentionally failed to disclose to American drivers that the airbags and seatbelts in more than 15 million vehicles may fail to activate in head-on collisions due to an electrical defect. The suit claims that the airbag control units in the cars contain specialized microchips that fail to properly receive and interpret signals from the vehicles’ crash sensors, which can prevent airbags from deploying and seatbelts from tightening when a crash is imminent. In addition, the lawsuit alleges that the defendants have known of the airbag control unit defect for at least a decade yet pushed these vehicles to market and delayed issuing recalls for the affected models. Want to see if your car is affected? You can find the details here.

Spartan Mosquito Eradicator – A Complete Scam?

Thankfully, the mosquito population is beginning to dwindle down in our part of the world due to the cooler weather – but during peak season, any form of defense against the pest is appreciated, so long as it actually works. Unfortunately, a proposed class action lawsuit is alleging that one popular treatment known as the Spartan Mosquito Eradicator is a complete scam that fails to live up to its claims of controlling mosquitos for up to 90 days. Now, the complaint isn’t just claiming that the product fails to hit the advertised 90-day benchmark – it’s saying that the product is wholly ineffective and provides no relief from the annoying insects. Here’s the issue: Spartan Mosquito Eradicator only has three active ingredients (salt, sugar and yeast) to which the consumer is instructed to add water. This concoction is supposed to attract mosquitos and kill them before they breed. Repeated research has shown, however, that salt is ineffective in eliminating mosquitos. In short, Spartan Mosquito Eradicator doesn’t work, the complaint alleges. A full writeup of the lawsuit can be found here.

Class Action Settlements:
Can You File a Claim?

Latest Class Action Settlements

Our settlements page is always being updated. Have you checked to see if you're covered by any open settlements? You can also check out the latest settlements as they happen by following us on Twitter.

Latest Settlements

  • Kia Engines
  • If you own or lease a 2011-2019 Kia Optima, 2012-2019 Kia Sorento or 2012-2019 Kia Sportage equipped with a 2.0- or 2.4-liter genuine Theta II engine, you may be able to get some money back.

  • Sharp Microwave Drawers
  • If you bought one of several Sharp microwave drawers between January 1, 2009 and August 5, 2020, you may be included in this settlement.

  • 2 Towns Ciderhouse
  • If you bought one of several 2 Towns hard cider products between March 12, 2016 and October 11, 2020, you may be included in this settlement.

Ending Soon

  • Cancer Medication Price Fixing (October 15)
  • USAA – Tennessee, Mississippi (October 19)
  • San Diego Airport Car Rentals (October 20)
  • Rossi Revolver (October 22)
  • Capital One ATM Fees (October 26)

To view a complete list of settlements and to find out how you can file a claim, click here.

~ In Other News ~

Fogging Defect Plagues “Always Visible” Watches

A proposed class action is alleging that consumers who bought Luminox’s "Navy SEAL" watch with self-illuminating technology did not get what they paid for. Specifically, the lawsuit claims that the product suffers from a defect that causes the watch face to fog up when worn outdoors in hot or cold temperatures. According to the complaint, the watches are supposedly designed for “extreme performance,” made for “rugged outdoorsmen,” able to offer “extreme visibility” and even touted as “The Official Watch of the Navy SEALs.” Unfortunately, the suit says they’re fogging up at outdoor temperatures below 40 degrees Fahrenheit or above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. The plaintiff, an avid surfer, fisherman, diver and sailor, is looking to represent all U.S. consumers who bought the watches at issue during the longest time period allowed by law. Want more? You can read up on the lawsuit here.

Sally Beauty Supply Less Than a Liter Sale?

Many of us buy in bulk so we can save money in the long run, but some companies may be deceiving us when it comes to just how much of their products we’re actually getting. Apparently, beauty supplies aren’t exempt to this problem, as a new lawsuit has been filed claiming that “many, or even most” of the items offered by Sally Beauty Supply during its “Liter Sale” are less than a liter. Now, Sally Beauty Supply doesn’t manufacture or label every product promoted in its Liter Sales, but the lawsuit claims that the retailer is nevertheless responsible for advertising the items as “liters” as a way to “capitalize on consumers’ desire for a bargain.” The lawsuit goes on to assert that Sally Beauty customers would not have bought the products in question, or would have at least paid less for them, had they known how much they were actually getting. If you want the details, we have you covered.

~ Forward to a friend ~

Know someone who might be interested in our newsletter? Why not forward this email to them?

~ Connect With Us ~

Facebook
Twitter
 
 

Having trouble reading this? View it in your browser.

 
 

Please do not reply to this message.
Replies to this message are routed to an unmonitored mailbox. Thank you.

 
Unsubscribe from Newsletter

[Sender_Address], [Sender_City], [Sender_State] [Sender_Zip]

 
                                                           
ClassAction.org
©2009 - 2025 ClassAction.org
  • View All Cases
  • Settlements
  • Report a Potential Claim
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Notice
  • Comment Policy
ClassAction.org Newsletter

Stay Current

Sign Up For
Our Newsletter