Reyer Parking Corp. Knocked with FLSA Lawsuit
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Sabala-Gomez v. Reyer Parking Corp. et al
Filed: January 20, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-00435
A proposed class action filed in New York claims defendants Reyer Parking Corp. and its owner violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
A proposed class action filed in New York claims defendants Reyer Parking Corp. and its owner violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay employees proper minimum and overtime wages. The plaintiff, who worked as a parking attendant for the defendants from March 2013 through November 2016, claims he worked a total of 84 hours per week without being paid at the time-and-a-half hourly overtime rate. For the last six months of his employment, the plaintiff says he received only two days off each month, also without overtime. Lastly, the suit claims the plaintiff is owed spread-of-hours pay for days in which he worked 10-hour-plus shifts:
“[The plaintiff] worked six or seven shifts per week that lasted in excess of 10 hours from start to finish, yet [the defendants] willfully failed to pay him one additional hour’s pay at the minimum wage for each such day, in violation of the New York Labor Law and the supporting New York State Department of Labor regulations,” the lawsuit alleges.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.