Hermès Bag Lawsuit Alleges Luxury Retailer Illegally ‘Ties’ Birkin Handbag Buys to Other Clothing, Accessories [UPDATE]
Last Updated on September 26, 2024
Cavalleri et al. v. Hermès International et al.
Filed: March 19, 2024 ◆§ 3:24-cv-01707
A class action lawsuit alleges Hermès has illegally “tied” the sale of high-end Birkin bags to other items sold by the luxury brand.
California
September 26, 2024 – Federal Judge Says Birken Bag Antirust Lawsuit Needs Amending
At a September 19, 2024 hearing, a federal judge instructed that the proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page be amended to clearly allege how Hermès has restricted competition in the luxury handbag market, Law360 reports.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
According to Law360’s write-up, Judge Donato at the hearing was “struggling” to see how the defendant’s alleged conduct caused antitrust injury to the plaintiffs.
“Hermes is basically making people show their loyalty by buying other stuff from Hermes before they get the big one, the Birkin bag,” U.S. District Judge James Donato said. “How does that foreclose competition from Gucci?”
The plaintiff’s counsel responded that the defendant’s alleged scheme forces customers to buy Hermès products they might have otherwise bought from other luxury brands. Judge Donato pointed out that this assertion was not included in the complaint, nor were any claims describing exactly how Hermès exerts monopoly power in the luxury handbag market, Law360 relays.
Judge Donato ultimately offered the plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their complaint and terminated Hermès’ motion to dismiss the case.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges Hermès International and Hermès of Paris have illegally “tied” the sale of high-end Birkin bags to other items sold by the luxury brand.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 17-page antitrust lawsuit says the handmade leather tote bags—which sell for upwards of a few thousand dollars and are often considered a status symbol due to their “unique desirability, incredible demand and low supply”—are not available for purchase on Hermès’ website and are never publicly displayed for sale at its luxury retail stores. Instead, Hermès sales associates provide the opportunity to purchase a Birkin bag only to those “deemed worthy,” the complaint claims.
According to the case, Hermès instructs sales associates to offer Birkin bags exclusively to customers who have what it considers to be sufficient purchase histories. As a result, customers are effectively “coerced” into buying other Hermès items—such as shoes, scarves, belts, jewelry or home goods—in order to obtain access to the French-made handbag, the lawsuit explains.
The filing claims this so-called “tying arrangement” violates the federal Sherman Act, an antitrust law which prohibits companies from intentionally engaging in “predatory” conduct to restrain competition within a certain market.
“With this scheme Defendants were able to effectively increase the price of Birkin handbags and, thus, the profits that Defendants earn from Birkin handbags,” the case summarizes.
Per the suit, Hermès carries out this anticompetitive scheme through its sales associate incentive program. Although the workers don’t earn commissions from Birken bag sales, the defendants direct them to use the exclusive product as a way to pressure consumers into buying other items for which they are paid 1.5 or three percent commission, the case alleges.
One plaintiff, a California resident, says that when she contacted Hermès in September 2022 about buying a Birkin bag, she was informed that the specialty bags go to “clients who have been consistent in supporting our business” and denied the opportunity to make the purchase. Another plaintiff, also from California, made multiple unsuccessful attempts to buy a Birkin bag in 2023 and was told by sales associates on each occasion that he first needed to purchase other items and accessories, the complaint says.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone in the United States who, within the past four years, purchased or was asked to purchase ancillary Hermès products in order to purchase a Birkin handbag.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.