Bloom Institute of Technology (BIT) faces a proposed class action that alleges the apparently unaccredited computer coding school lied about job placement rates and fraudulently ensnared thousands of students into giving the program’s private investors a cut of their future earnings.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 36-page lawsuit against BIT, formerly known as Lambda School, says that although the private, for-profit institution prominently advertised job placement rates of 74 to 90 percent, private investors were told those figures, in truth, were closer to 27 to 50 percent.
Further, while BIT claimed publicly that it “wouldn’t get paid unless students did,” given that students are asked to sign an income sharing agreement (ISA) before enrolling, the school, in reality, “packaged and sold” ISAs to private investors well before students obtained employment, the lawsuit alleges.
Per the case, San Francisco-based Lambda, founded in 2017 by CEO Austen Allred, even misrepresented that it had state approval to operate when, in fact, “it did not.”
“Through these misrepresentations, Lambda ensnared thousands of students in its scheme to extract (or sell off the rights to extract) up to $30,000 from each students’ [sic] future earnings,” the lawsuit summarizes.
Unlike traditional higher education institutions, Lambda and later Bloom Institute of Technology claimed that they would not only teach students coding but connect them with tech jobs, all while requiring that tuition payments be made only after a student has received a qualifying job, the suit explains. This was accomplished through ISAs, which Lambda and its CEO touted as a “disruptive, revolutionary approach to education financing” and as purported evidence that the school was “equally invested in students’ ultimate job market success,” the complaint says. Per the lawsuit, tuition to Lambda costs between $21,000 and $30,000.
The plaintiffs, four former Lambda students, allege the school not only falsified and misrepresented its job placement rates and the true nature of its financial interest in students’ success but hid the fact that, until August 17, 2020, it did not have necessary approval from the California Bureau of Postsecondary Education (CBPE) to operate as a school. The suit alleges Lambda concealed from students that it was under order from the CBPE to cease operations and instructional services, stop enrolling students and submit a closure plan.
“Plaintiffs and members of the proposed class enrolled at Lambda under false pretenses,” the complaint says, alleging the school’s course catalogues, from at least May 2019 through August 17, 2020, falsely stated that it was approved by the CBPE to operate.
Under an ISA with Lambda, a student would agree to pay 17 percent of their post-graduation salary for 24 months, but only once they were making more than $50,000 per year, according to the case. The suit says ISA payments were capped at a maximum of $30,000.
The filing contends that neither the plaintiffs nor other students who signed ISAs prior to August 17, 2020 would have done so, indebting them for up to $30,000 in tuition, had they been aware that Lambda was operating without a license and that its legal status was uncertain.
The lawsuit looks to cover:
“All persons who enrolled at Lambda and: (i) entered into an ISA, retail installment contract, deferred tuition plan, or any other tuition payment plan with an arbitration clause that contains a carve-out for any proceeding commenced by either party seeking an injunction or any other equitable remedy; or (ii) who otherwise did not sign any such agreements with an arbitration clause, or opted out of one; and (iii) who have not yet had their ISA, retail installment contract, deferred tuition plan, or other tuition payment plan cancelled and all payments made to Lambda refunded.”
The case also looks to represent all persons who fit the aforementioned description and who enrolled at Lambda prior to August 17, 2020, the date the school obtained CBPE approval to operate.
The suit asks the court to order BIT to cancel proposed class members’ ISAs and ISA/tuition payment plans, to declare the plans null and void, to pay restitution and to enjoin the school from continuing to misrepresent its job placement rates and collecting on any other ISAs.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed cancer, endometriosis or reproductive problems after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.