in Newswire Published on February 13, 2017

Solomon and Solomon P.C. Facing FDCPA Class Action Suit

Last Updated on May 8, 2018

Daniels v. Solomon and Solomon P.C. et al

Filed: February 13, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-00757-RBS

A Pennsylvania woman has filed a proposed class action that claims defendant Solomon and Solomon P.C. violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Defendant(s)

Solomon and Solomon P.C.

Law(s)

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

State(s)

Pennsylvania

A Pennsylvania woman has filed a proposed class action that claims defendant Solomon and Solomon P.C. violated federal law by attempting to collect a debt in a state where it had no jurisdiction. According to the 17-page complaint, neither Solomon and Solomon P.C. nor its attorneys are licensed to practice law in Pennsylvania, yet the collection notice the plaintiff received include language stating: “Please be advised that your account with Solomon and Solomon P.C. still remains unpaid, and has been reported to the national credit bureaus.”

The lawsuit claims the defendant’s use of the above language in a collection notice would confuse the least sophisticated consumer as to whether the defendant was “meaningfully involved” in the matter.

Case Spotlight

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.

Daniels v. Solomon and Solomon P.C. et al

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Sign Up For
Our Newsletter