RESPA Class Action Filed Against Bank of America, Carrington
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Hawes v. Bank Of America, N.A., et al
Filed: May 8, 2017 ◆§ 3:17-cv-00346-MHL
Bank of America, N.A. and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC are facing a Virginia consumer's proposed class action claiming the companies broke the law.
Bank of America, N.A. and Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC are facing a Virginia consumer’s proposed class action claiming the companies broke the law by wrongfully foreclosing on his home without satisfying certain conditions precedent to foreclosure in the man’s deed of trust. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff’s deed of trust, which was insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), mandated a face-to-face meeting between the man and the defendants before foreclosure could take place on his home.
Further, the lawsuit claims Carrington Mortgage violated the Real Estate and Settlement Procedure Act (RESPA) with its alleged failure to follow certain mandatory steps after receiving the plaintiff’s complete mortgage assistance application at least 37 days before the foreclosure sale.
“As a matter of policy and common practice, [the defendants] made absolutely no effort to arrange a face-to-face meeting with [the plaintiff] or the putative class before three full monthly installments due on the mortgage are unpaid,” the case claims. “Moreover, consistent with its policy not to conduct face-to-face interviews, [the defendants] never made a trip to [the plaintiff’s] home where its intent was to provide loss mitigation services within this timeframe.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.