Page v. Forster & Garbus, LLP et al.
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on July 24, 2018
Page v. Forster & Garbus, LLP et al.
Filed: June 21, 2018 ◆§ 2:18-cv-03611
A proposed class action has been filed in New York against Forster & Garbus, LLP; two of the firm’s attorneys; Navient Solutions, Inc.; Navient Solutions, LLC; and SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2012-C.
A proposed class action has been filed in New York against Forster & Garbus, LLP; two of the firm’s attorneys; Navient Solutions, Inc.; Navient Solutions, LLC; and SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2012-C. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants filed suit against the plaintiff to collect a student loan debt and served him the summons (Exhibit A) on June 21, 2017.
“Exhibit A amounted to a false, deceptive or misleading means in connection with the collection of a debt by F&G, Navient, Garbus, and Forster in violation of [the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act],” the complaint argues.
The suit claims the defendants subjected the plaintiff to an “abusive, deceptive, or misleading” debt collection practice that was unlawful under federal law.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.