in Newswire Published on December 5, 2017

Lawsuit: ShoreTel Proxy Statement Missing Information Concerning Merger

Last Updated on May 8, 2018

Frydman v. ShoreTel, Inc. et al.

Filed: August 22, 2017 ◆§ 5:17-cv-04865

A stockholder filed a proposed class action lawsuit against ShoreTel, Inc. and its board of directors over an allegedly misleading proxy statement the defendants filed in connection with Mitel Networks Corporation’s potential acquisition of the company.

Defendant(s)

ShoreTel, Inc.

Law(s)

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

State(s)

California

Categories

Securities

A stockholder filed a proposed class action lawsuit back in August against ShoreTel, Inc. and its board of directors over an allegedly misleading proxy statement the defendants filed in connection with Mitel Networks Corporation’s potential acquisition of the company. Specifically, the suit claims the proxy statement is missing details of ShoreTel’s financial projections and “key inputs and assumptions” used in the financial analyses performed by its financial advisor. The plaintiff claims the statement also failed to disclose the percentage of shares owned by company executives that had been pledged in support of the merger, which he argues is material information to stockholders.

Case Spotlight

Video Game Addiction Lawsuits

If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.

Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit

Kratom 7-OH Lawsuits

Anyone who has used 7-OH kratom products and suffered a serious injury, such as overdose, heart attack or addiction, may be able to take legal action.

How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?

Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?

Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?