Lawsuit Claims Debt Collection Pollack & Rosen Failed to Identify ‘Current’ Creditor
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Howe v. Pollack & Rosen, P.A. et al.
Filed: November 21, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-14405-KAM
A consumer claims Pollack & Rosen, in a collection notice, implied her debt had been transferred to a new entity different than the original creditor.
A Florida consumer has filed a lawsuit against Pollack & Rosen, P.A. and one individual with control of the firm over possible violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The plaintiff claims the Florida debt collector mailed her a notice in June 2017 in which it implied that her account had been transferred from her original creditor, Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., to a new subsequent creditor. The defendants allegedly failed to identify this supposedly new, “current” creditor, an alleged misstep the lawsuit claims is misleading to the plaintiff.
Further, the plaintiff argues that the signature of the individual defendant, a partner of Pollack & Rosen, on the aforementioned collection notice is deceptive in that the attorney has no meaningful involvement in the collection of the woman’s debt.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.