Consumers Allege Diamond Resorts, Barclays Bank Delaware Misled Timeshare Buyers [UPDATE]
Last Updated on October 20, 2021
Jocson v. Diamond Resorts International Club, Inc. et al.
Filed: November 10, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-08214
A California couple claims Diamond Resorts Intl. and Barclays Bank Delaware utilize unscrupulous tactics to mislead timeshare buyers.
October 20, 2021 – Parties Reach Private Settlement
The lawsuit detailed on this page was dismissed in July 2018 after the parties reached a private settlement.
The two plaintiffs then filed another lawsuit in December 2018 against Diamond and Experian Information Solutions in which they alleged that Diamond continued to report to credit agencies that they owed money under their purchase agreements despite having entered into a previous settlement. That lawsuit has now been resolved through arbitration in Diamonds’ favor.
Read ClassAction.org’s writeup of the case here.
Diamond Resorts International Club, Inc. (DRI) and Barclays Bank Delaware are the defendants in a 10-count proposed class action in which two plaintiffs claim the companies misled consumers through “hard pressure” sales tactics, oral misrepresentations, and false statements.
The 21-page complaint lays out a scenario that begins around November 2016 when the plaintiffs signed onto a membership with DRI whereby they would ostensibly acquire timeshare “points” that could be redeemed in exchange for perks and accommodations at various resorts. In order to obtain these points, the case says, the plaintiffs obtained financing directly from DRI and a “Diamond Resorts International” credit card issued by Barclays. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs were sold a sampler package made up of 2,500 points and led to believe their monthly timeshare payments went solely toward the purchase of more points.
In January 2017, DRI reportedly informed the plaintiffs that it should not have sold them 2,500 points because, the lawsuit says, that amount is insufficient to obtain any of the promised vacation privileges. The case says DRI then told the plaintiffs they needed to buy an extra 6,000 points to gain a “silver” membership, after which they could then access vacation perks.
The plaintiffs take issue with DRI’s allegedly “hard pressure sales tactics,” which the complaint says left them feeling manipulated and intimidated into signing a new contract with the company.
At an “update meeting” in June 2017, the lawsuit continues, the plaintiffs were reportedly told that, contrary to DRI’s previous representations, their membership was not in fact a “silver” membership, and that, once again, they lacked sufficient rewards points to gain any vacation privileges. At this point, the plaintiffs were then urged to sign up for a Diamond Resorts International credit card to finance the down payment for yet again upgrading their membership.
When the plaintiffs tried using their rewards points on an August 2017 vacation, DRI allegedly advised them that if they failed to buy more points, they would lose their benefits.
All told, the complaint alleges the defendants “act in cahoots” through false advertising and misrepresentations to induce consumers into signing contracts and paying for phantom upgrades they never wanted.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.