in Newswire Published on March 6, 2017

Class Action Says Rhino Relocation Ignored National Do-Not-Call List

by Corrado Rizzi

Last Updated on May 8, 2018

Clayton v. Rhino Relocation

Filed: March 6, 2017 § 1:17-cv-00324-DAD-SAB

A proposed class action citing alleged Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations claims defendant Rhino Relocation used a prohibited automatic telephone dialer.

Defendant(s)

Rhino Relocation

State(s)

California

Case Spotlight

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

ClassAction.org Newsletter

Stay Current

Sign Up For
Our Newsletter

New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.

This browser does not support PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it: Download PDF.

Last Updated on May 8, 2018 — 11:49 AM

Corrado Rizzi

corrado@classaction.org

Corrado Rizzi is the Senior Managing Editor of ClassAction.org.

About ClassAction.org

ClassAction.org is a group of online professionals (designers, developers and writers) with years of experience in the legal industry.

Learn More

Before commenting, please review our comment policy.