in Newswire Published on March 15, 2019

Antitrust Class Action Alleges Private Security Companies Have Suppressed Security Guards’ Wages Through No-Poach Clauses

by Erin Shaak

Last Updated on March 21, 2019

Kenny v. Critical Intervention Services, Inc. et al

Filed: March 14, 2019 § 8:19cv636

A proposed class action filed in Florida federal court alleges illegal no-poaching agreements within the private security services industry have suppressed competition for customers and reduced wages and mobility among security guards.

Case Spotlight

Video Game Addiction Lawsuits

How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?

ClassAction.org Newsletter

Stay Current

Sign Up For
Our Newsletter

New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.

Last Updated on March 21, 2019 — 4:26 PM

Erin Shaak

erin@classaction.org

Erin works primarily on ClassAction.org’s newswire, reporting on cases as they happen.

About ClassAction.org

ClassAction.org is a group of online professionals (designers, developers and writers) with years of experience in the legal industry.

Learn More

Before commenting, please review our comment policy.