Amerco Hit with ADA Class Action Over ‘Excessive Slopes,’ Other Potential Accessibility Issues
Last Updated on July 17, 2018
Shetler v. Amerco, Inc.
Filed: July 2, 2018 ◆§ 2:18-cv-00867-JFC
Amerco, Inc. is the defendant in a proposed class action in which a wheelchair-reliant Pennsylvania consumer claims the company’s facilities are not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Amerco, Inc. is the defendant in a proposed class action in which a wheelchair-reliant Pennsylvania consumer claims the company’s facilities are not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The lawsuit alleges Amerco has “systematically discriminated against” individuals’ mobility disabilities by failing to remedy inaccessible parking lots and paths of travel at its facilities.
The plaintiff claims she experienced “unnecessary difficulty and risk” when she visited the defendant’s Washington Blvd. location in Pittsburgh.
“Without injunctive relief, [the plaintiff] will continue to be unable to fully and safely access [the defendant’s] facilities in violation of her rights under the ADA,” the complaint reads.
The case goes on to allege at least seven of the defendant’s properties across Pennsylvania, Ohio, South Carolina and New York lack van-accessible parking spaces, among other brick-and-mortar ADA infractions.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.