Excessive HSBC Hazard Insurance
Last Updated on February 4, 2026
Investigation Complete
Attorneys working with ClassAction.org have finished their investigation into this matter. Check back for any potential updates. You can also sign up for our free newsletter for the latest in class action news and settlements.
If you still have questions about your rights, contact an attorney in your area as there is a time limit for filing all lawsuits. The information on this page was posted when the investigation began and is now for reference only.
Free Consumer Tools:
- Open and Current Class Action Lawsuit Settlements and Rebates
- Open and Current Class Action Lawsuit List, Investigations
- Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
- Free Class Action Lawsuit Database
In a lawsuit achieving class action status, HSBC has been charged with imposing excessive and overpriced hazard insurance on homeowners to procure a hidden and unwarranted profit. While force placing homeowner’s insurance on homeowners whose policies have lapsed is not illegal in and of itself, HSBC has been accused of inflating the cost of that insurance nearly 400% to the financial benefit of the bank and its subsidiaries, Assurant Inc and Tracksure Insurance Agency Inc, who have also been named as defendants in the suit.
If you are a property owner who was forced to pay for an overpriced, unnecessary or otherwise excessive insurance policy, you may have legal recourse to recover monetary damages, including premiums paid out of this coverage.
HSBC Forced Placed Hazard Insurance Lawsuit
It is not uncommon for lenders to require borrowers whose policies have expired to carry hazard insurance. This is done fairly regularly to protect creditors from situations in which an uninsured homeowner’s property is damaged. While it is legal for banks to purchase and force placed property insurance at the homeowner’s expense, it has been alleged that banks are purchasing coverage costing up to 10 times as much as a borrower purchased policy. HSBC has been accused of making a hidden profit from the inflated cost of insurance and receiving kickbacks from its subsidiaries, which could be considered illegal under a federal law known as the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). By abusing its authority in this manner, HSBC creates unnecessary financial hardships on clients and families who may already be burdened with economic struggles, according to allegations.
Forced Placed Hazard Insurance Attorneys
“Force placing” occurs when a lender legally purchases insurance on behalf of a borrower who either does not have insurance or whose coverage has expired. It is illegal, however, for a bank to overcharge its clients to procure hidden and unwarranted funds for itself and its subsidiaries. Recently, several well-established banks, including HSBC, have been accused of abusing their authority and profiting from inflated insurance prices.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.