Chesapeake Energy Price-Fixing, Antitrust Lawsuits
Last Updated on June 26, 2017
Investigation Complete
Attorneys working with ClassAction.org have finished their investigation into this matter. Check back for any potential updates. You can also sign up for our free newsletter for the latest in class action news and settlements.
If you still have questions about your rights, contact an attorney in your area as there is a time limit for filing all lawsuits. The information on this page was posted when the investigation began and is now for reference only.
Free Consumer Tools:
- Open and Current Class Action Lawsuit Settlements and Rebates
- Open and Current Class Action Lawsuit List, Investigations
- Class Action Lawsuit and Settlement News
- Free Class Action Lawsuit Database
At A Glance
- This Alert Affects
- Landowners in northwest Oklahoma who entered into oil and natural gas leases with Chesapeake between December 2007 and March 2012.
- What's Going On?
- It is believed that these leaseholders may have been cheated out of money in light of allegations that Chesapeake Energy conspired to rig bids for the purchase of oil and natural gas leases.
- Is There Any Proof?
- The Department of Justice released a statement stating that the former CEO of Chesapeake was indicted for "masterminding" a conspiracy to not compete for oil and natural gas leases.
Landowners in northwest Oklahoma who entered into oil and natural gas leases with Chesapeake Energy between December 2007 and March 2012 may have been cheated out of money when they leased their properties for oil and natural gas extraction. A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that Chesapeake conspired to rig bids for the purchase of leases in the area, leaving little room for competition in the marketplace.
Why Was the Lawsuit Filed?
The lawsuit was filed because the companies worked together to fix the prices of their oil and gas leases, while allocating the interest among themselves. Under federal antitrust laws, it’s illegal for companies to conspire to restrain commerce, as it allows for little to no competition in the marketplace.
According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), the three companies would decide beforehand who would “win” a specific lease and then the “winner” would allocate an interest in the leases to the other companies. The agency claimed that the CEO instructed his subordinates to carry out the conspiracy, which included “withdrawing bids for certain leases and agreeing on the allocation of interests in the leases between the conspiring companies.”
Days before the lawsuit was filed, the DOJ announced that the former CEO had been indicted for “masterminding” this alleged conspiracy.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.