<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>ClassAction.org Blog - Breaking Class Action News and Legal Updates</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.classaction.org/blog" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.classaction.org</link>
<description>The ClassAction.org Blog</description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:38:24 EST</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2026</copyright>
<item>
<category>Fraud</category>
<category>Washington</category>
<category>Consumer Fraud</category>
<category>Food</category>
<category>False Advertising</category>
<category>Washington Consumer Protection Act</category>
<category>Celsius Holdings Inc.</category>
<title>Celsius Lawsuit Alleges Energy Drinks Cannot Burn Fat on Their Own as Advertised</title>
<dc:creator>Corrado Rizzi</dc:creator>
<link>https://www.classaction.org/blog/celsius-lawsuit-alleges-energy-drinks-cannot-burn-fat-on-their-own-as-advertised</link>
<guid>https://www.classaction.org/blog/celsius-lawsuit-alleges-energy-drinks-cannot-burn-fat-on-their-own-as-advertised</guid>
<description>A class action lawsuit alleges that Celsius energy drinks are falsely advertised as able to help burn fat and boost metabolism.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 03:55:39 EST</pubDate>
<media:content url="https://www.classaction.org/media/celcius-blog-thumb_2.png" type="image/png" medium="image" height="384" width="270" fileSize="48186" />
</item>
<item>
<category>California False Advertising Law</category>
<category>Fraud</category>
<category>Newly Filed / Newly Settled</category>
<category>New York General Business Law</category>
<category>Class Action Lawsuit</category>
<category>Washington</category>
<category>California Unfair Competition Law</category>
<category>Food</category>
<category>California Consumers Legal Remedies Act</category>
<category>False Advertising</category>
<category>Washington Consumer Protection Act</category>
<category>Starbucks Corporation</category>
<title>Starbucks Lawsuit Claims ‘Sugar-Free’ Protein Beverages Contain Substantial Amounts of Sugar</title>
<dc:creator>Olivia DeRicco</dc:creator>
<link>https://www.classaction.org/blog/starbucks-lawsuit-claims-sugar-free-protein-beverages-contain-substantial-amounts-of-sugar</link>
<guid>https://www.classaction.org/blog/starbucks-lawsuit-claims-sugar-free-protein-beverages-contain-substantial-amounts-of-sugar</guid>
<description>A class action lawsuit claims that certain lactose-containing Starbucks ‘Sugar-Free’ protein drinks are falsely advertised as containing no sugar. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 03:17:13 EST</pubDate>
<media:content url="https://www.classaction.org/media/thumbnail-starbucks.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" height="384" width="270" fileSize="44129" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>